Category Archives: Inspiration
Thanks to all who shared their thoughts about the last two posts. I posted the two leaning tree images, as they generated an interesting discussion in the field while making them. When Dan (tour partner) showed me the first image (below) with what some of you see as a tree leaning out, I too had the same reaction. It felt like the tree was leaning out of the frame. He responded by saying “I see it as an element that is directing the eye into the frame.” Commenter Rad, has done a good job of articulating what Dan and then I ultimately saw, thus prompting me to make the capture. “The leaning out image for me has a circular, repeating motion to it. I find my eye following the leaning tree into the frame at the bottom, across to the yellow trees on the right, and then up and to the left to do it all over again. The vertical lines are less figural and play a supporting role to the lead characters of the leaning tree and the two yellow trees on the right.” So, at this point, I would argue that the leaning tree in the first image is actually leading the eye into and not out of the frame.
Now, lets look at the other image. This one, most agree, has the tree leaning into the frame. Again Rad does an excellent job breaking down what my eye is doing. “The one leaning in takes me in a clean, horizontal but staccato ride from left to right. It’s about the horizontal line of color contrasted with the staccato rythym of the vertical lines of the trees. I can almost hear it as a cymbal crash, followed by a drum beat with a thread of yellow “melody” holding it all together. For me it flows in one direction – left to right- and exits at the right.” Man, I love the drum and cymbal analogy! Thanks Rad.
I think it instructive to reiterate what commenter Frank said as it is why I added the leaning tree to each composition. “This is a great example of a comp(composition) based on a pattern and a break in pattern, with all the verticals except for one. ” Frank is correct about adding an element to break a pattern. Pattern images are fine, however, when we add an element that breaks the pattern, we add visual interest. This element may direct the eye in a very clear way. Other times it may simply break the pattern giving the eye a place to go and then bounce back to the pattern. I’ve cloned out the leaning tree in the image below to illustrate. I think the leaning tree makes for a more interesting and impactful image.
As evidenced by the varied comments, there appears to be no right or wrong image. We each see or read images differently. Ultimately, you need to decide what works best for you. And fight for your vision by the way. Just because someone does not agree, this does not make them right and you wrong.
Lastly, I believe discussions like this are important. Not enough people carefully assess their (or others) images. Doing so allows you to make a more thoughtful decision about your composition in the field.
Which image do I prefer? The second one.
My tour partner Dan Sniffin learned a valuable lesson over the course of our last two tours together. His story is worth sharing as it illustrates a point I make in my presentation, “Discovery & The Creative Choice.” And that is to beware of expectations. Up until the Smoky Tour this spring, Dan has typically arrived with expectations. He might say something like, I want to find a lone tree in fog or I am looking for such and such situation. Then during the tour and even the pre-tour, he would be focused on finding such. This time, as Dan arrived in the Smokies he said to me, “John, I have no expectations on this tour. I just want to relax and whatever happens, happens.” And guess what? Dan produced what I believe to be some of his finest work. And, he produced more “keepers” than on any other tour we’ve done together. Next, he arrived in the Palouse a few weeks ago and said, “John, I’ve shot in the Palouse 10 times, I’m not sure I’ll be doing much shooting. I’m going to relax but if I see something, I’ll get a camera out. If not, thats fine too.” Guess what? Yup, once again Dan produced stellar images and more of them than any other trip to the Palouse.
What is the point? By removing expectations and by being open to what was being given to Dan, he was actually able to see more! I would suggest that you don’t try and force images to fit an expectation you have. Rather, just be still and let the images come to you! Beware of those pesky expectations. You know, the expectation to come home from this trip with 10 “keepers.” Or, I saw these killer images of Iceland on 500px. Now I have to go to Iceland to make similar images. These kind of expectations can be dangerous and can potentially influence your “seeing” in a negative way as you’ll be under pressure to succeed against false or unattainable expectations. As evidenced by Dan’s success, it is much better to relax and be open to whatever right answer presents itself.
Todays image is from the Palouse. We had been out chasing late light and a storm. We finally stopped on a road where there is a wonderful red barn scene. We waited and waited for the light to come through the thick clouds behind us to light up the barn. Then it came, lasting for less than a minute. The problem for me, was the red barn didn’t have enough clouds above it when the light came. So, I searched for another right answer and found this! I love the streak of gold light and the tremendous clouds. So glad I followed my own advice for once and did not stay focused on the expectation we had of shooting the red barn in last light.
If you’re not following Chuck Kimmerle on his blog you should. His latest post about light is excellent. www.chuckkimmerle.com/blog/
What matters most to you? For me it is certainly not photography. What? What did John just say? Let me put it this way. I was recently made aware of a friends newly revealed battle with cancer. Roxanne has a great attitude, however, the doctors are demanding she take off at least six months from work to diagnose and treat her cancer. As such, she and her husband Doug will face some stiff financial challenges. With this in mind, they have set up a Giveforward Hope for Roxanne website where YOU can help support them during this challenging time. I have faith that my friends who frequent this blog will stop and realize what is important. I love to share my photographs with you. I love the lively discussions we have about photography. But, today I’m asking you to consider what matters most and give what you can to Roxanne. Thank you!
If there was ever a blog post to share, this would be it. PLEASE click the share button so more can have a chance to be of service!
The blog image is from the Palouse where my tour partner Dan and I will be leading two back to back tours starting in just over a week! I can’t wait as the Palouse is one of our favorite locations in the United States.
A high school friend reminded me of an image that was on my old site but not part of this one. It is a personal favorite and one my Mother has hanging in her house. I used it as part of a blog post back in November, but today I wanted to share the rest of the story as Paul Harvey would say.
The image was made in South Africa in 2004. I was there with mentor Nancy Rotenberg and friends Dee Whittlesey and Ferrell McCollough attending a Freeman Patterson workshop. Freeman has been a major influence from the beginning of my photography journey. It was Freeman who inspired me with his creative techniques such as multiple exposures and slide sandwiches. Both techniques were used to create this image. All this is well and good, but the more important thing is the impact an image can have. This image is meaningful to me because each time I look at it, I am transported back to this magical moment and reminded of the important life lesson learned. I was there during a time when my business was not doing well. I didn’t feel I should go because I could not afford it, but my loving wife demanded I go. It was a “trip of a lifetime” she said, and “I needed to be there to learn from Freeman.” I was excited to photograph the flowers in the fields, the “secret waterfall” and other iconic scenes I had seen in Freeman’s books. And then Freeman said, we would spend a day in Nourivier, a small town of 300 people and 90 homes. I was disappointed, I had no interest in photographing people in a small desert town, but reluctantly I went. And then, after spending about an hour with the people, especially the youth, (who giggled at how tall I was) I found myself in tears, sobbing actually. Nancy asked if I was okay? I said I think so, but I’m not sure what is going on. Then on our “free day” later in the week, I had to go back! Yes, at first I didn’t want to go at all, but now I had to go back to understand that was going on. On the return trip, I realized what it was. I was there in this poor town surrounded by people who had nothing. No electricity, no running water, no shoes, tattered clothing, etc,. And here I was with $20,000 of gear on my back. I was feeling selfish for even thinking I had it bad because my business was floundering. I had a very nice roof over my head, nice clothes and plenty of food. I had all I needed, but was feeling anxious, stressed, worried, etc. Yet these people wore big smiles and were happy with what they had. Indeed, I realized I was needy and selfish and ashamed for being so, thus the tears. I was not sad for them, I was sad for m. It is this lesson I am reminded of, each time I see this image.
The woman is from Nourivier dancing at sunset on the rocks surrounding her town. I montaged (put two pieces of film in together in one slide mount) this image with a multiple exposure I made in the fields of flowers making a slide sandwich. This image sums up the essence of my journey to South Africa where I was able to learn from my hero AND from the wonderful people of Nouriver.
I find it interesting that this image resonates with so many other people. Once again this confirms that when we get in touch with our feelings and attach them to our work, we will create images that make our hearts sing!
And for my high school friend Suzanne, the image is now part of the “Others” folio on this site!
As Stephen said in his comment to my last post, you can’t plan on great conditions when you’re on a schedule leading a photo tour. You’re at the mercy of what is given you. As I see it, that is not necessarily a bad thing. Let me share a story. I was leading a workshop, a short weekend type. It was during the fall and the colors that year were stunning! We had not spent more than 3 hours together when a participant came to me and said they were going home. I asked why, was it something I had done? She replied, “no, its just I’m not finding what I came for.” Perplexed, I suggested, maybe you will find something better! But you see, she had an assignment for the photo club and was focused on that. The conditions and the area I picked that morning might not have been good for what she was looking for but they were great for many other things. She was simply not open to finding another right answer. I found that to be sad.
Fast forward to the Alabama Hills. We arrived late in the day during the scouting portion of our last tour. When I go to the Alabama Hills, I’m thinking about the rock formations and hoping for great clouds. When we arrived, there were no clouds. No problem, I turned around and saw this great situation brewing around Mount Whitney. Another right answer! I could have said, “I’m not finding what I came for” but instead I found something else! Its all about attitude. If you don’t think you’ll find something, you probably won’t.
Recently I featured a terrific post written by my tour partner Dan Sniffin about his ideas with regard to photo celibacy which Cole Thompson tries to live by. Dan’s article was written before we spent the week with Cole and the group. The tour started with a wonderful lecture by Cole titled “Why B&W.” In it he spoke not only about B&W but also more about his ideas on photo celibacy. But what happened after the talk was quite powerful. I asked the group to respond to Cole’s ideas specifically about celibacy. What did they think? It was one of the most stimulating discussions I’ve been part of. Some agreed, others challenged Cole with good honest questions. Some spoke about the need for a basic understanding of technique. We spoke about technique versus vision. We spoke about the value of others opinions. We spoke about rules and guidelines and much more. It was a stimulating hour of discussion! I’m not sure we resolved anything but we carried the spirit of the discussion with us throughout the week. In fact, I am still pondering on the matter and would like to continue the discussion here.
I am reading a book suggested by Chuck Kimmerle titled “Why People Photograph” by Robert Adams. These quotes resonated in lieu of our discussion.
“I really didn’t have much to teach. I didn’t even believe in it. I felt so strongly that everybody had to find their own way. And nobody can teach you your own way…. in terms of art, the only real answer that I know of is to do it. If you don’t’ do it you don’t know what might happen” Harry Callahan,1991
With regard to the blog image from the Alabama Hills. Yes, the recent tour was focused on B&W and my folder of images is 99% B&W, however, that did not stop me from processing this one in color! Why color versus B&W? I wish I had a good answer, sometimes color just makes more sense and I run with my gut feeling. In the dunes, I can’t imagine anything but B&W yet I’ve seen some wonderful images that are color. So color or B&W becomes a creative choice, there is no right or wrong.
The other day Tony Sweet emailed a picture of his Mom. He made the image with his iPhone while taking his iMom to the eye doctor or iDoc as he calls her.
Tony made a blog post about his thoughts on his image here.
These are my thoughts. Great photography creates an emotional response. This is a classic photograph that underscores the idea that it is not about the camera but rather about connection. Connection to subject, be it a person or a sand dune for that matter. This image is full of connection. Full of joy, silliness and fun. And that is clearly felt by the photographer and now by me, the viewer. Thus, Tony has created a very successful image, no matter the camera, because of the connection. I love this picture and can’t stop looking at it. Tony emailed me this morning and simply said, “I’m still giggling”. Me too!
To further cement my thoughts. Our special guest instructor for the Eastern Sierra tour last week was the amazing Cole Thompson. One of his most successful images is “The Angel Gabriel” Cole has given me permission to use it and his words below. Yes, the image is special but read the story and tell me that connection was not part of its success.
The Angel Gabriel – Newport Beach, CA – 2006
- This is the Angel Gabriel. I met him on the Newport Beach pier as he was eating French Fries out of a trash can.
- He was homeless and hungry. I asked him if he would help me with a photograph and in return, I would buy him lunch.
- The pier was very crowded and I wanted to take a 30 second exposure so that everyone would disappear except Gabriel.
- We tried a few shots and then Gabriel wanted to hold his bible. The image worked and the only
- people you can see besides Gabriel are those “ghosts” who lingered long enough for the camera.
- Gabriel and I then went into a restaurant to share a meal; he ordered steak with mushrooms and onions. When it came,
- he ate it with his hands. I discovered he was Romanian and so am I, so we talked about Romania. He was simple,
- kind and a pleasure to talk with. I asked Gabriel how I might contact him, in case I sold some of the photographs and
- wanted to share the money with him. He said I should give the money to someone who could really use it; that he had
- everything that he needed.
- Then the Angel Gabriel walked away, content and carrying his only two possessions: a Bible and a bed roll.
Now, with the idea of connection clearly in mind, pay attention to how you feel and respond to the images below.
This is a favorite image of Nancy Rotenberg. My regular blog readers will know who she is and what she meant to me. Now that you know who she is, does it affect your reaction?
The more you connect with your subject, the more those who view your image will too.
If you’re finding value in this site, might I ask that you share with your social communities? Thank you!
Why Photo Celibacy?
A growing number of photographers are practicing what is known as “photo celibacy,” where one does not use the images of another as a guide to his/her own work. Cole Thompson, among others, practices this. Most photographers commonly view the work of others to gain insight and inspiration. I’m kind of in-between. My initial reaction is that one has to start somewhere — a technical/visual foundation if you will.
I think this works for Cole, but I submit that it was a slow process for him to get to this point. In other words, what he does today didn’t “just happen” by picking up a camera and going out to capture his “vision.” He takes it for granted now, but trust me he has looked and studied a lot of work before this celibacy stage of his photographic journey. I clearly agree with him that at some point one should distance his work from others if he wants it to stand out as uniquely his.
I get inspiration from others’ work, and therefore continue to learn from it rather than copying it. To make my point, put a group of photographers together in the same place and see how many different images/interpretations/visions come forth. For me, it’s not the location or copying of someone else’s vision. It’s about what you “see” while you’re in or near that same location. That is what vision is to me.
Years ago, I wanted to capture an image of Galen Rowell’s Horsetail Fall in Yosemite NP. I researched the time of year, time of day, direction of light, and lens choice(s) among other technical information. Even weather variations were checked to increase my percentage of success. I ended up with an image similar to Rowell’s. When I look at it now all I see HIS image — not mine. This puts an exclamation point on Thompson’s theory and practice. It’s a bad idea to study other photographer’s landscapes for the sole purpose of duplicating it. There is something that just doesn’t feel right by doing so.
However, I don’t consider looking at the work of other photographers as “contaminating” either. I see them as building blocks, thereby layering my knowledge and technique. We would not be human if we didn’t feel the angst when we see superb photographs. So much so that often we feel insecure and/or inadequate. This is NORMAL — and common! Another reason I agree to some extent with Cole Thompson’s philosophy.
So taking famous landmarks is fine in the beginning (as you build your foundation), but working to find alternatives and originality — your vision — remains the ultimate objective of an artist. To illustrate my point here (below) is an alternative image of the classic shot of the alpenglow on El Capitan in winter light (above).
I’m including a story I wrote about the making of this image (below) as I believe it helps convey my thoughts.
A Reflection of Yosemite
Many of Yosemite National Park’s landmarks—Yosemite Falls, Half Dome, and Glacier Point—I have photographed on many occasions. But on this cold December afternoon in 1988 I wanted to capture the stillness of this renowned national park. I found it when I stopped at Valley View in Yosemite Valley’s west end, a tourist favorite. I was very fortunate to have the place to myself.
By then the Merced River was cloaked in its familiar deep-blue shade leaving two of Yosemite’s most identifiable landmarks, El Capitan and Cathedral Rocks, glowing in magnificent light. From experience I knew this type of light is fleeting and rare. I also knew instinctively how little time remained before this light would vanish and immediately searched for compositions that symbolized what I felt.
Scanning the river through my camera’s viewfinder I noticed a colorful spot of reflected light. Isolating an area no larger than a common sheet of binder paper I found a granite boulder jutting upwards through the surface of the river surrounded by plates of ice. A leaf nestled gently into a shallow notch in the protruding rock, seemingly frozen there in time. The combinations of light reflected from the precipice of El Capitan and the cobalt-blue sky bathed the now-silent Merced River in breathtaking contrasts of warm and cool colors.
This memorable moment of solitude ended abruptly when a car appeared in the parking area behind me. A couple got out to admire the view that lay before them marveling at the golden glow atop El Capitan as it crept slowly up its enormous rock face.
As I worked in the shade they became aware of my presence near the river’s edge. In an attempt to avoid an intrusion on my privacy I heard him quietly ask her, “What’s he taking a picture of?”
I glanced back and noticed the woman standing behind me on her tiptoes looking over my shoulder from a short distance away, apparently puzzled by what I saw that she might have missed. Her curiosity drew her in even closer as she stood silently behind me in the bitter cold winter shade.
When the sun set and the sky turned its inevitable gloomy gray the couple walked back to the warmth of their car. Once again he asked her, “What was that guy taking a picture of anyway?”
“Nothing really.” she said. “It was only a reflection.”
© Dan Sniffin – June 6, 2001
Dan Sniffin my dear friend and tour partner. To see more of his stunning photography, please visit his newly redesigned website. www.dansniffinphoto.com
Southside Johnny getting lost in it
Fuji X-E2 – 35mm at f 1/4, ISO3200
In his most recent blog post, Cole Thompson suggested how something is better accomplished by personal vision than technical expertise. This reminded me of a friend, who, when asked if her image was captured with digital or film, would reply, “do you like it?” Inevitably, the person would answer, “I love it.” She would then say, “great!” and never answer the question at all. Essentially she was saying: Does it matter?
I think there is a difference. My friend’s point was valid, film or digital? Who cares? I agree. However, with Cole’s point, I agree in part. Vision is indeed important and we should relentlessly pursue ours. But I feel the more we understand technique, be it in-camera or in post processing, the better equipped we are to be able to achieve our vision.
Let me illustrate, if I did not understand the techniques needed for image overlay and texture work, I would never have been able to achieve my vision for the Disney picture I created a few posts back.
For me, vision and technique are intertwined. In fact, I would suggest we need to understand technique so well that we are freed from its constraints and liberated to pursue our vision. Otherwise, we might be frustrated in not being able to fulfill our vision. Another illustration. You see an image like the one below but don’t know how you might create something similar. Frustration sets in and you move on to something else.
However, if someone shares the technique, you now have the knowledge and can use it to achieve your vision. The trick is: How do you take this new knowledge and create a vision of your own?
This is where your vision becomes so important. Your objective is to take this knowledge and create something new. Something like the Disney creation above.
When I’m asked, how did you do that? I’m prone to share. I understand where Cole is coming from. He is serious about encouraging folks to chase their vision without influence from others, and I am on board with that. However, I think people are at different places along the creative path. Without a clear understanding of technique, I think it might be harder for some to achieve their vision.
“Develop an infallible technique, then put yourself at the mercy of inspiration.” Zen maxim
“One is not really a photographer until preoccupation with learning has been outgrown and the camera in his hands is an extension of himself. There is where creativity begins.”
Carl Mydans (1907-2004) American photojournalist
“I see no reason for recording the obvious.” Edward Weston, photographer
Fuji X-E2 – 35mm f/1.4, ISO 2000
Be the light. No really, be the light. Oft times we hear the masses exclaim, “its all about the light”, and they would be partly right. The quality of light is something we need to be keenly aware of. However, the light I’m speaking of is your own. The light we see is one thing, the light we bring to the act/process of image making is another thing. Ansel Adams said it this way, “You bring to the act of photography all the pictures you have seen, the books you have read, the music you have heard, and the people you have loved.” Freeman Patterson says “The camera points both ways.” It sees what it sees but is also a reflection of you. Your light if you will. By the way, this includes the bad mood you’re in, feeling tired, feeling overwhelmed, the argument you just had with your spouse, etc, etc. The energy from this kind of light may or may not be a good thing. It depends on how you choose to use it and what type of images you are making. Just know that your light whatever that is, will become part of your images.